Video Rating: 3 / 5
UFOEvidence.coUFO Evidence |
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
UFOEvidence.co is powered by WordPress Using Tigopedia Sponsored By Access Web Proxy
UFOEvidence.coUFO Evidence |
Video Rating: 3 / 5
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
UFOEvidence.co is powered by WordPress Using Tigopedia Sponsored By Access Web Proxy
@mrbollocks1979 Roughly translated, you just hate having your fantasies questioned.
@Tralman1965 Why? Can’t you see it’s a case of mistaken identity? Did you look at the video?
@Thesortvokter Nawww, she is pretty much a ufo nut, who’ll believe any sort of nonsense people tell her.
I agree schnibsey. IMO Ian Ridpath has done a fantastic job of removing the veil of mystery surrounding this “famous” case. People who are resistant to his prosaic explanations should take a step back and attempt to look at this a little more objectively.
What is of interest to me; is how witnesses changed or elaborated on their story after the event.
Simply because you dont want to accept this guys opinion shouldn’t mean that he deserves to be insulted. There are many sides to a story/event all he is doing is offering another perspective. What is so wrong with that.
Notice that he uses ridicule as a tactic in debunking others. L. M. Howe is NOT a UFO-nut as he proposes, she is a serious researcher and a journalist.
Funny too how he forgets all the startling info about the interrogation of the witnesses and all the testimonies of OBJECTS HOVERING etc.
This case is to big to let your opinion on it be determined by this bafoon. He has personal interest in the case being explained away, since he “debunked” it.
Like all things different and money to be made then anyone would perhaps take the chance .The truth is obvious that in our rather large surrounds called space then all is not what we know and so our ignorance should be accepted but not change ours
never knew fireballs had strange writing on them.
The “Shitehouse Theory”, IMO.
Ridpath’s bloody-minded ignorance is simply unsurpassed. He is a parasitic leech who remains ignorant of the vast majority of testimony. One just needs to listen to his smarmy tone to see that what he is *really* interested in is getting his own voice heard and allowing his own egotism to run rampant, hanging tightly onto the coattails of the Rendlesham case and its true witnesses.
The Rendlesham Forest UFO incident is, to me, one of the most convincing UFO stories yet.